TL;DR

A case study analysis examines a real-world scenario (business situation, patient case, social phenomenon) and proposes solutions based on evidence and theory
Use the SWOT or Issue-Based framework: identify the problem, analyze causes, evaluate alternatives, recommend a solution
Always connect your analysis to course concepts and theories — that's what professors are grading
The biggest mistake is jumping straight to recommendations without thoroughly analyzing the problem first

What Is a Case Study Analysis?
Types of Case Studies by Discipline
The Universal Framework (5 Steps)
How to Read and Analyze a Case
Writing the Analysis
SWOT Analysis for Business Cases
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Template and Structure
Examples by Discipline

What Is a Case Study Analysis?

A case study analysis is an assignment where you examine a detailed scenario — usually a real-world situation — and apply theoretical frameworks and course concepts to analyze what happened, why it happened, and what should happen next.

Think of it as a bridge between theory and practice. Your professor has taught you frameworks and concepts in lectures; the case study is where you prove you can APPLY those concepts to messy, real-world situations.

Unlike a research paper (where you choose your own topic) or an essay (where you argue a position), a case study analysis gives you a specific situation and asks you to dissect it systematically.

The skills you develop — critical analysis, problem identification, solution evaluation, and evidence-based decision-making — are exactly the skills employers look for. This isn't busywork; it's training for your career.

Types of Case Studies by Discipline

Business / Management

You analyze a company facing a strategic decision or problem. You might examine Apple's product strategy, a small business struggling with growth, or a startup choosing between funding options. Your analysis uses frameworks like SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, PESTEL, or financial analysis.

Nursing / Healthcare

You analyze a patient case with specific symptoms, history, and circumstances. You identify diagnoses, evaluate treatment options, and create care plans based on evidence-based practice and clinical guidelines.

Psychology

You analyze an individual's behavior, symptoms, or situation using psychological theories and diagnostic criteria. You might use the DSM-5 for diagnosis, apply behavioral theories, or evaluate treatment approaches.

You examine a client's situation and develop intervention plans using social work theories and ethical frameworks.

Law

You analyze court cases, identifying legal issues, applying relevant laws and precedents, and arguing positions.

Education

You analyze a teaching scenario, student behavior, or educational policy using pedagogical theories and research.

The specific format varies by discipline, but the underlying analytical process is similar across all of them.

The Universal Framework (5 Steps)

Regardless of your discipline, every case study analysis follows this basic structure:

Step 1: Identify the Problem(s)

What is the central issue or challenge? This seems simple but it's where most students go wrong. They identify symptoms instead of root causes.

Example: A business case says sales are declining.

Symptom: Sales are declining
Root cause: The company hasn't adapted its product line to changing customer preferences while competitors have innovated

Your analysis needs to dig to the root cause level.

Step 2: Analyze the Situation

Examine all relevant factors that contribute to the problem. Consider:

Internal factors (company culture, resources, management, operations)
External factors (market trends, competition, regulations, economic conditions)
Stakeholder perspectives (who is affected and how?)
Historical context (how did we get here?)

This is where you apply course frameworks and theories.

Step 3: Generate Alternatives

Identify 2–4 realistic solutions to the problem. Each alternative should be:

Feasible (the organization/person can actually do it)
Specific (not vague suggestions)
Different enough from each other to represent real choices

Step 4: Evaluate Alternatives

Assess each alternative against specific criteria:

Pros and cons
Costs and benefits
Short-term vs. long-term impact
Risks
Alignment with goals and values
Feasibility of implementation

Choose the best alternative and explain WHY it's the best choice. Your recommendation should include:

What to do
How to implement it
When to implement it
What results to expect
How to measure success
What risks to monitor

How to Read and Analyze a Case

First Read: Get the Story

Read the case quickly to understand the narrative. Don't analyze yet — just absorb:

Who are the key players?
What happened?
What's the timeline?
What decision needs to be made?

Second Read: Identify Issues

Read again with a highlighter. Mark:

Statements that indicate problems or challenges
Data (financials, statistics, survey results)
Decisions that were made and their consequences
Environmental factors (competition, regulation, market trends)
Quotes from key characters that reveal values, motivations, or biases

Third Read: Apply Frameworks

Read once more with your course concepts in mind:

Which theories apply to this situation?
Which frameworks can I use to organize my analysis?
What assumptions are the case characters making?
What information is missing that would help my analysis?

Take Notes Using the Framework

Organize your notes according to whatever framework you're using (SWOT, PESTEL, stakeholder analysis, etc.) rather than in the order information appears in the case. This transforms raw case information into an analytical structure.

Writing the Analysis

Structure for a Standard Case Study Analysis

1. Introduction (1 paragraph)

Briefly introduce the case:

Company/individual/situation name
Key context (industry, time period, circumstances)
Central problem or question
Your thesis or main recommendation (preview)

2. Background (1–2 paragraphs)

Relevant history and context:

How did the situation develop?
What decisions led to the current state?
What external factors are relevant?

Keep this concise — don't retell the entire case. Your professor already knows the story. Only include background information that's relevant to your analysis.

3. Problem Identification (1–2 paragraphs)

Clearly state the central problem and any secondary issues:

What is the core challenge?
What symptoms indicate this problem?
Why is this problem important to address?
Who is affected?

4. Analysis (3–5 paragraphs)

This is the heart of your paper. Apply course concepts and frameworks:

Use SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, PESTEL, stakeholder analysis, or whatever framework applies
Connect observations to specific theories from your course
Use data from the case as evidence
Consider multiple perspectives

5. Alternatives (2–3 paragraphs)

Present 2–4 realistic options:

Describe each alternative clearly
Note the key advantages and disadvantages
Be specific — "improve marketing" isn't an alternative; "launch a targeted digital advertising campaign focused on millennials with a $50,000 budget" is

6. Recommendation (1–2 paragraphs)

Choose your best alternative and justify it:

Why is this the best option?
How does it address the root cause?
What are the expected outcomes?
How should it be implemented?
What metrics should be used to evaluate success?

7. Conclusion (1 paragraph)

Briefly summarize your key findings and recommendation. Connect back to the broader lessons or course themes.

Writing Style Tips

Be analytical, not descriptive. Don't just describe what happened — explain why it happened and what it means.
Use evidence from the case. Support every claim with specific data, quotes, or observations from the case material.
Apply course concepts explicitly. Name the theories and frameworks you're using: "According to Porter's Five Forces framework, the threat of substitutes is high because..."
Be specific in recommendations. Include concrete actions, timelines, budgets, and measurable outcomes.
Write in third person. Unless told otherwise, avoid "I think" or "in my opinion." Instead: "The analysis suggests..." or "The evidence indicates..."

SWOT Analysis for Business Cases

SWOT is the most commonly used framework for business case studies. Here's how to do it well.

Strengths (Internal, Positive)

What advantages does the organization have?

Strong brand recognition
Talented management team
Financial resources
Proprietary technology or patents
Customer loyalty
Efficient operations

Weaknesses (Internal, Negative)

What internal factors are holding the organization back?

Outdated technology
High employee turnover
Limited financial resources
Weak brand awareness
Inefficient processes
Lack of innovation

Opportunities (External, Positive)

What external factors could benefit the organization?

Growing market demand
Favorable regulation changes
Competitor weaknesses
New technology availability
Demographic shifts
Untapped markets

Threats (External, Negative)

What external factors could harm the organization?

Increasing competition
Changing consumer preferences
Economic downturn
Regulatory challenges
Technological disruption
Supply chain vulnerabilities

Beyond Basic SWOT

A basic SWOT list is just the starting point. To score well:

Prioritize: Not all factors are equally important. Identify the 2–3 most significant items in each category.
Connect: Show how strengths can address threats, how opportunities can compensate for weaknesses, etc.
Be specific: "Strong brand" is generic. "Brand recognition of 85% among target demographic ages 18–34" is specific.
Use case evidence: Every SWOT factor should be supported by specific information from the case.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Retelling the Case Instead of Analyzing It

The most common mistake. Your professor has read the case. They don't need a summary. Focus on analysis — the "so what?" and "why?" questions.

Bad: "The company was founded in 2010 and grew rapidly. By 2020, revenue had reached $50 million. In 2022, a new competitor entered the market."

Good: "The company's rapid growth between 2010 and 2020 was driven primarily by first-mover advantage in an emerging market. However, this growth masked underlying weaknesses in product innovation, which became apparent when a better-funded competitor entered the market in 2022."

2. Jumping to Recommendations Without Analysis

Students sometimes identify the problem and immediately say "here's what they should do" without explaining WHY that solution is appropriate. The analysis section is what demonstrates your critical thinking. Don't skip it.

3. Being Too Vague

"They should improve their marketing" or "They need better leadership" aren't useful recommendations. What specific marketing actions? What specific leadership changes? Include details, timelines, and costs.

4. Ignoring Course Concepts

Your professor assigned this case to test whether you can APPLY course material. If your analysis doesn't reference theories, frameworks, or concepts from the course, you're missing the point.

5. Presenting Only One Alternative

Even if you think there's an obvious best answer, present multiple alternatives to show you considered different approaches. This demonstrates analytical rigor.

6. Using Outside Research When Not Asked

Some case study assignments want you to work only with the information provided in the case. Others want you to supplement with outside research. Check the instructions carefully.

7. Ignoring Constraints

Recommendations need to be realistic. If the case says the company has $100,000 in cash reserves, don't recommend a $5 million expansion. Work within the constraints presented in the case.

Template and Structure

Here's a template you can adapt for most case study analyses:

Title: [Case Study Analysis: Company/Subject Name]

I. INTRODUCTION
- Brief context (1-2 sentences about the company/subject)
- Central problem statement
- Preview of recommendation

II. BACKGROUND
- Relevant history (only what matters for analysis)
- Current situation
- Key stakeholders

III. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
- Primary problem
- Secondary issues
- Root cause analysis

IV. ANALYSIS
- Framework application (SWOT, Five Forces, PESTEL, etc.)
- Internal analysis
- External analysis
- Connection to course theories
- Evidence from case data

V. ALTERNATIVES
- Alternative 1: [Name] — Description, pros, cons
- Alternative 2: [Name] — Description, pros, cons
- Alternative 3: [Name] — Description, pros, cons
- Evaluation criteria comparison

VI. RECOMMENDATION
- Chosen alternative and justification
- Implementation plan (what, who, when, how)
- Expected outcomes and metrics
- Potential risks and mitigation

VII. CONCLUSION
- Summary of key findings
- Broader lessons and implications

Length Guidelines

Short case analysis (2–3 pages): Focus on problem identification, brief analysis, and recommendation
Standard case analysis (5–8 pages): Full structure with detailed analysis and multiple alternatives
Comprehensive case analysis (10+ pages): Deep analysis with extensive framework application, financial analysis, and detailed implementation plans

Examples by Discipline

"XYZ Company's 15% decline in market share between 2023 and 2025 stems not from product quality issues — customer satisfaction scores remain above 90% — but from a pricing strategy misaligned with the shifting market. Porter's Five Forces analysis reveals that the bargaining power of buyers has increased significantly as three new competitors entered the market, giving customers alternative options. Simultaneously, XYZ maintained premium pricing without increasing the perceived value gap over competitors. The recommended strategy involves a two-tier pricing model: maintaining the premium line for brand-loyal customers while introducing a mid-range product to capture price-sensitive segments, projected to recover 8–10% market share within 18 months."

Psychology Example: Treatment Planning

"The client presents with symptoms consistent with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) as outlined in the DSM-5, including persistent excessive worry across multiple domains for more than six months, difficulty controlling worry, and associated symptoms of restlessness, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. Applying the Cognitive-Behavioral model (Beck, 1979), the client demonstrates characteristic cognitive distortions including catastrophizing and probability overestimation. The recommended treatment plan combines CBT techniques — specifically cognitive restructuring and graduated exposure — with relaxation training, scheduled over 12–16 weekly sessions, which meta-analyses indicate produces effect sizes of 0.8–1.0 for GAD."

Nursing Example: Care Planning

"Based on the patient assessment data, the primary nursing diagnosis is Impaired Gas Exchange related to alveolar-capillary membrane changes as evidenced by SpO2 of 88% on room air, use of accessory muscles, and bilateral crackles on auscultation. Applying Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory, the patient currently requires wholly compensatory nursing care for respiratory function. The priority intervention is positioning in high Fowler's position and administering supplemental oxygen at 2L/min via nasal cannula, with continuous pulse oximetry monitoring. Expected outcome: SpO2 ≥ 94% within 2 hours of intervention."

Final Thoughts

Case study analyses are challenging because they require you to think like a practitioner — diagnosing real problems, evaluating messy situations with incomplete information, and making recommendations that could actually work.

Here's your process:

Read the case three times (story, issues, frameworks)
Identify the root problem (not just symptoms)
Analyze using course concepts and frameworks
Generate multiple realistic alternatives
Recommend and justify with evidence
Be specific in your implementation plan

The students who excel at case studies are the ones who go beyond surface-level analysis to ask "why?" multiple times until they reach root causes. Practice this habit and your case studies will stand out.

Need help analyzing a case study? Gradily's AI tools can help you apply frameworks, organize your analysis, and strengthen your arguments. Try it free today.

Editorial Standards